Key application: influences on education

You need to apply the theories from the cognitive-developmental approach to education for example the introduction of child-centred learning, scaffolding and the spiral curriculum.

Think about how you have been taught in primary and secondary school. You have probably experienced a range of teaching styles. The styles employed have been profoundly influenced by cognitive-developmental psychology – particularly by the theories of Piaget and Vygotsky. Before the 1960’s teaching methods in the Britain were profoundly influenced by behaviourist psychology. The behaviourists favoured a transmission model of education. This involves giving a range of knowledge and skills by direct instruction. Direct instruction means a teacher delivering material to children by talking and writing and dictating notes. Children were seen as passive recipients of knowledge. Little effort was made to understand what children were taught to what they were capable of understanding.
However by the 1960’s and 1980’s the work of Piaget and Vygotsky was becoming very influential in both psychology and education, and progressive, child centered models of learning began to appear.

The Plowden report of 1967 recommended a shift from traditional teaching to more progressive styles of teaching. The report highlighted 3 things;
1. Children need to be given individual attention and cannot all be treated the same way.
2. They shouldn’t be taught things until they are developed enough intellectually to cope with them.
3. Children mature intellectually, physically and emotionally at very different rates.

Discovery learning (Piaget)

• The child needs the materials and then can discover things
• Child needs to construct its own knowledge
• Young children will not use formal operational thought or understand logical arguments
• Need to structure the curriculum so children can discover for themselves

The teacher must
• assess child’s stage of development
• have interested tasks so child will explore
• create disequilibrium so child forced to assimilate and accommodate new info.
• learning process important not facts
• small group work useful, social value and interacting helps with egocentrism
• curriculum needs to fit individual children

 

Child-centred learning (Piaget)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summerhill_School
http://www.summerhillschool.co.uk/ read summerhill policy


• Learning should focus on the child
• Schools should provide materials so children can explore and build schemas
• Children adapt, reach a state of equilibration and then disequilibria as they learn more
• Requires an active enquiring child
• Teacher is not really required
• Teacher only useful at concrete operational stage and above
• Children need to work at own level
• Whole-class teaching abandoned in favour of small group teaching
• Small tables of children working on different subjects at different
levels

Reciprocal teaching (Vygotsky)

Palincsar and Brown developed in 1984 to help children decode written material and understand it – the teacher and a small group reads, the group leader summarises the content, the group either agrees or re-read and discuss again. Important skills are asking questions, summarising and clarifiying.
Relevant to Zone of Proximal development as children can read for meaning without having abilities needed. Rosenshine and Meister (1994) show that reciprocal teaching is effective.

 

Collaborative learning (Vygotsky)


• Teachers should guide, extend and challenge.
• Means that those who do know can help those who do not.
• Co-operation rather than competition
• Foot (1994) suggests that collaborative learning can help older children too

 

Scaffolding – based on Vygostsky’s ideas about cognitive development.

www.glenorchy.tased.edu.au/.../scaffolding.htm

Scaffolding is that help which will enable a learner to accomplish a task that they would not have been quite able to manage on their own, and it is help which is intended to bring the learner closer to a state of competence which will enable them eventually to complete such a task on their own.
Whoever is taking the role of the tutor for the child is said to be providing scaffolding for them.
This can be a teacher, or a peer. It just has to be someone who knows more than the child. The scaffolding is the context that allows the child to achieve whatever they want or solve the problem.
Without this scaffolding the children is unable to learn. ‘Scaffolding’ suggests that the structure can be taken away. As the child gets more competent, the tutor can withdraw support gradually until the problem is solved or the skill is achieved.The metaphor of scaffolding is used to illustrate the need to provide temporary supporting structures that help learners to develop new understandings, new concepts and abilities. As the learner develops control of these, support is withdrawn.

 


Wertsch (1980) suggests that if Vygotsky’s ideas are correct then any new skill should be done socially first, then individually. This was tested and found to support this idea.

The spiral curriculum ( Bruner)

A spiral curriculum is where a wide number of topics are taught in the early grades. The topics are cycled throughout the years, developing deeper understanding through the later grades.
• One way of training children is to teach a subject at increasing level of difficulty so that the child has time to move from the iconic mode (facts) to the symbolic mode (and principles) of representation.

• Child can them understand similar facts
• Child reasoning and learning for itself and then move forward without being taught everything

In 1960, Bruner proposed a “spiral curriculum” concept to facilitate structuring a curriculum ´around the great issues, principles, and values that a society deems worthy of the continual concern of its members´ (Bruner, 1960). The next decades many school system educators attempted to implement this concept into their curriculum. Bruner (1975) described the principles behind the spiral curriculum in the following way:

”…I was struck by the fact that successful efforts to teach highly structured bodies of knowledge like mathematics, physical sciences, and even the field of history often took the form of metaphoric spiral in which at some simple level a set of ideas or operations were introduced in a rather intuitive way and, once mastered in that spirit, were then revisited and reconstrued in a more formal or operational way, then being connected with other knowledge, the mastery at this stage then being carried one step higher to a new level of formal or operational rigour and to a broader level of abstraction and comprehensiveness. The end stage of this process was eventual mastery of the connexity and structure of a large body of knowledge”

 



Web references:

Piaget in the classroom
Vygotsky in the classroom
Bruner in the classroom